|
Thursday, August 26, 2010
3:51 am edt
Friday, March 6, 2009
Where is Cambridge heading in today’s fast moving cosmopolitan world?
Hi I'm Albert Gazeley,
Cambridge is a very unique city which is known throughout
the world – but sadly its worldwide reputation is not appreciated in the city itself , and least of all - by the people
that are privileged to run it.
I
have chosen to write about Cambridge under the "Cambridge 3000" heading as I wish to keep looking ahead
rather than thinking of the present 2000 which is already upon us
and beginning to
look rather tarnished for want of a better word . . .. .
Consequently
this name is by no means no accident and wont go out of fashion too quickly - at least for a thousand years
. . .
Unlike the much banded about
“Cambridge Phenomenon” title which has faded during the current financial crisis like a murky
sunset over the gray haze of the slowing down of industry and record job losses – and in my opinion, unless the
City and University see eye to eye on the planning and redevelopment of this medieval city – traffic jams will
grow as more and more vehicles become trapped in a cage of rising bollards. (Heaven knows what the powers that be will do
with the recently proposed half a billion pounds to improve transport – probably more cycle paths and pedestrian bridges
over motorways . . if their past record is anything to go by.
In years past Cambridge
was something of a two headed dragon – the Town and the Gown – but in more recent years it has given birth to
a three headed monster – The University, The City,( represented by the various councils and sub-committees that
are invariably at loggerheads with each other) and more recently, the Man in the street – grassroots democratic “What
about me” voter, who is often ignored by both the University and the all powerful civil servants of the Cambridge City
- managed by Councils and Planners.
Cambridge is of course an amazing city – but it has a less than
amazing management team.
The grandeur of the City is of course based in the middle ages, originally without a
bridge when the Roman Legions established themselves at Granchester at the time of Christ - as they marched down the back
of Castle Hill, through Madingley and Coton, on their way to London. ( The Coton to Cambridge was in fact a toll
road more than a hundred years back would you believe - as reported in the Coton Parish Records )
Cambridge was originally a fording place like Oxford, but since the bridge was built it took on a more central development.
It really began to take shape when the Monks arrived from Oxford 800 years ago, and various Kings and Worthies
sponsored the wonderful buildings to house the students of the growing University – and they did all this without local
planning approval, shops and houses were quickly demolished and beautiful buildings sprung up, with the conscripted slave
labor that was plentiful and of course cheap.
By the time William the Conqueror (1066-1087)
arrive, it had about three thousand population and was an important port – hard to imagine all the stone for the
colleges and churches arriving by barge along the river and the Car Dyke through Waterbeach. .
By the time that
Oliver Cromwell was elected Member of Parliament for Cambridge – it had risen to about 5,000 – but sadly from
that time on, the planning of the City as a rational development, was all but lost – and in my opinion it has never
recovered.
Of course in this day and age it is not wise to expand on an old development – as the infrastructure
cannot sustain the growing population –but nevertheless that unfortunately is the policy of Cambridge, and consequently
as the powers that be continue to advocate an infill policy putting infill building between houses, eliminating all the beautiful
gardens to make way for inappropriate housing and garage spaces packed on top of the old town, much of which was well thought
out before planning committees were established.
Now unfortunately the infrastructure that forms the unseen
original roots of Cambridge, such as the roadways, the piping and sewers and cables etc cannot take the weight, loading
, or the stress . . and the growing City is therefore becoming pot bound and congested. But there
is another way – about which we will talk in the next few days.
4:56 am est
|
|
|
2010.08.01 |
2009.03.01

|

|
| A. GAzeley in Shang-hi May 2009 |
This is
me in Shang-hi . . on a visit from my base in Hong Kong, where I have lived and worked on and off for the past forty years
or so. . I am now semi-retired . In the background of some of the photos on this site you can see some of the futuristic buildings for which
Hong Kong (and now China ) are famous for. Many of these buildings are built by
British architects that bring their clients to Hong Kong, and in my recent times to China and the Middle East to view their
work – simply because they could not get planning permission in the United Kingdom - and their best work is therefore
only done overseas . . Sadly Britain is losing out due
to this sad situation and ironically even Cambridge U.S.A. is pulling ahead of Cambridge U.K. due to the more flexible planning
situation in the U.S.A. and more importantly Boston is being developed in parallel alongside Cambridge in order to supply
all the services and accommodation to support Cambridge U.S.A. without the overpopulation and development of "Cambridge"
just across the river. It would be beneficial to our original
Cambridge if we preserved our medieval City by allowing a high-rise modern city to be built as a dormitory development nearby
linked by convenient monorail transport with shuttle trains running every three minutes or so similar to the Sidney, Dubai,
Hong Kong and many other forward looking cities around the world. To develop new low-rise villages like Camborne a dozen miles from Cambridge with
no proper services and no transport other than join in the morning rush hour along the A45 is ludicrous. Instead of giving
Cambridge the proper accommodation and facilities it needs the authorities are forcing about one hundred thousand people to
commute in and out of Cambridge each day on inadequate roads. The pollution and lost working time is nothing short of criminal.
It is estimated that for many commuters they spend 20% of their life sitting in a car or bus.
|