Cambridge 3000

Blog . . | My Cambridge | My Hong Kong | My Two Worlds | The Future | Transport | Poems by A. G. | FAQ Page | Contact
agpictures/blogpictureAG.JPG

This site  The Web 

Albert Gazeley - A man of Two Cities -  Hong Kong & Cambridge UK 

albert@gazeley.net

 

Thursday, August 26, 2010

3:51 am edt 

Friday, March 6, 2009

Where is Cambridge heading in today’s fast moving cosmopolitan world?


Hi I'm Albert Gazeley,

Cambridge is a very unique city which is known throughout the world – but sadly its worldwide reputation is not appreciated in the city itself , and least of all - by the people that are privileged to run it.


I have chosen to write about Cambridge under the  "Cambridge 3000" heading as I wish to keep looking ahead rather than thinking of the present 2000 which is already upon us

and beginning to look rather tarnished for want of a better word  . . .. .  


Consequently this name is by no means no accident and wont go out of fashion too quickly - at least for a thousand years . . .

Unlike the much banded about “Cambridge Phenomenon” title which has faded during the current financial crisis like a murky sunset over the gray haze of the slowing down of industry and record job losses  – and in my opinion, unless the City and University see eye to eye on the planning and redevelopment of this medieval city – traffic jams will grow as more and more vehicles become trapped in a cage of rising bollards. (Heaven knows what the powers that be will do with the recently proposed half a billion pounds to improve transport – probably more cycle paths and pedestrian bridges over motorways . . if their past record is anything to go by.    

In years past Cambridge was something of a two headed dragon – the Town and the Gown – but in more recent years it has given birth to a three headed monster – The University, The City,( represented by the various councils and sub-committees that are invariably at loggerheads with each other) and more recently, the Man in the street – grassroots democratic “What about me” voter, who is often ignored by both the University and the all powerful civil servants of the Cambridge City -  managed by Councils and Planners.

Cambridge is of course an amazing city – but it has a less than amazing management team.

The grandeur of the City is of course based in the middle ages, originally without a bridge when the Roman Legions established themselves at Granchester at the time of Christ - as they marched down the back of Castle Hill, through  Madingley and Coton, on their way to London. ( The Coton to Cambridge was in fact a toll road more than a hundred years back would you believe - as reported in the Coton Parish Records )   

Cambridge was originally a fording place like Oxford, but since the bridge was built it took on a more central development.   It really began to take shape when the Monks arrived from Oxford 800 years ago, and various Kings and Worthies sponsored the wonderful buildings to house the students of the growing University – and they did all this without local planning approval, shops and houses were quickly demolished and beautiful buildings sprung up, with the conscripted slave labor that was plentiful and of course cheap.    

By the time William the Conqueror (1066-1087) arrive,  it had about three thousand population and was an important port – hard to imagine all the stone for the colleges and churches arriving by barge along the river and the Car Dyke through Waterbeach. . 

By the time that Oliver Cromwell was elected Member of Parliament for Cambridge – it had risen to about 5,000 – but sadly from that time on, the planning of the City as a rational development, was all but lost – and in my opinion it has never recovered. 

Of course in this day and age it is not wise to expand on an old development – as the infrastructure cannot sustain the growing population –but nevertheless that unfortunately is the policy of Cambridge, and consequently as the powers that be continue to advocate an infill policy putting infill building between houses, eliminating all the beautiful gardens to make way for inappropriate housing and garage spaces packed on top of the old town, much of which was well thought out before planning committees were established.

Now unfortunately the infrastructure that forms the unseen original roots of Cambridge, such as the roadways, the piping and sewers and cables etc cannot take the weight, loading , or the stress . . and the growing City is therefore becoming pot bound and congested. 


But there is another way – about which we will talk in the next few days.

4:56 am est 

2010.08.01 | 2009.03.01

Link to web log's RSS file

ShhanghiBridges.jpg
A. GAzeley in Shang-hi May 2009

This is me in Shang-hi . . on a visit from my base in Hong Kong, where I have lived and worked on and off for the past forty years or so.  . I am now semi-retired .

In the background of some of the photos on this site you can see some of the futuristic buildings for which Hong Kong (and now China ) are famous for.

 

Many of these buildings are built by British architects that bring their clients to Hong Kong, and in my recent times to China and the Middle East to view their work – simply because they could not get planning permission in the United Kingdom -  and their best work is therefore only done overseas . .

 

Sadly Britain is losing out due to this sad situation and ironically even Cambridge U.S.A. is pulling ahead of Cambridge U.K. due to the more flexible planning situation in the U.S.A. and more importantly Boston is being developed in parallel alongside Cambridge in order to supply all the services and accommodation to support Cambridge U.S.A. without the overpopulation and development of "Cambridge" just across the river.

 

It would be beneficial to our original Cambridge if we preserved our medieval City by allowing a high-rise modern city to be built as a dormitory development nearby linked by convenient monorail transport with shuttle trains running every three minutes or so similar to the Sidney, Dubai, Hong Kong and many other forward looking cities around the world. 

 

To develop new low-rise villages like Camborne a dozen miles from Cambridge with no proper services and no transport other than join in the morning rush hour along the A45 is ludicrous. Instead of giving Cambridge the proper accommodation and facilities it needs the authorities are forcing about one hundred thousand people to commute in and out of Cambridge each day on inadequate roads. The pollution and lost working time is nothing short of criminal. It is estimated that for many commuters they spend 20% of their life sitting in a car or bus.     

        

Closed

agpictures/manoftwocities.jpg

For the past fifty years, Albert Gazeley has been a man of two cities -
Cambridge in UK and Hong Kong in China

Powered by Register.com